HealthCareMagic is now Ask A Doctor - 24x7 | https://www.askadoctor24x7.com

question-icon

Can You Give Opinion Regarding The Best Strategy To Follow In An Acute Coronary Syndrome ?

default
Posted on Tue, 20 Dec 2022
Question:
Dear
I have had previous discussion with you regarding my PCI and timing and cost of my second PCI.
I have been in discussion with the hospital regarding a request to waiver the cost of the second PCI however due to hospital protocol they have refused.

I still feel strongly that my case should warrant more consideration and I thought I might ask your opinion again.
Their reply is enclosed however there are a few areas that are not correct. Also they make in their initial paragraph that I was “dissatisfied with the services provided”… this is not true as I am very grateful for the two cardiologists who performed my PCI…my complaint was the charge.

My biggest concern is that they say my condition was not critical or life threatening hence the reason for payment. Is it possible to be 100% certain that my condition was not life threatening if I still had 70% blockage in two LAD artery. With angina and high blood pressure would it not be possible for a clot to form and cause full occlusion of the artery.
I think we had discussed the possibility of my condition being an extension of my acute attack. It seems a matter of contention with my second admission that there was no ST changes and therefore the hospital protocol is upheld.
Not all infarction have ST elevations…is that correct??

Anyway Dr I would like your opinion again as I feel the need to continue my plight to have the fee waived.

Regards Gavin
I have reply on attachment.no access for that here
doctor
Answered by Dr. Ilir Sharka (9 hours later)
Brief Answer:
I would explain as follows:

Detailed Answer:
Dear,

I am glad to discuss with you again!

I remember our last talk and would like to emphasize my opinion regarding the best strategy to follow in an acute coronary syndrome patient (which is similar to your case).

Let’s start with the definition of a critical or life-threatening condition.

We have seen in our daily clinical practice (working many years at an intensive cardiac care unit) that there are no clear cutoffs of the atherosclerotic plaque burden and the risk of an acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction).

In other words, a myocardial infarction may occur in the presence of a 100% occluded coronary artery, as well as a dangerous and life-threatening heart attack may happen because of a 30% or 50% coronary stenoses.

We have assisted many patients complicated with life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation) and apparently with clinically non-significant coronary stenoses (less than 70% - 75% coronary stenoses).

If left untreated they would have otherwise died. This in not because only of the reduction in blood flow within a fixed stenosis coronary artery but because of other superimposed disorders such as coronary spasm (more likely in a moderately narrowed artery), or clot over a destabilized coronary plaque.

That’s why it is difficult to predict with certainty whether it is completely safe deferring a second revascularization procedure to a distant time outside the first hospitalization.

My personal professional opinion would go in favor of performing the second revascularization intervention (LAD angioplasty and stenting) within the first hospitalization a few days after RCA treatment.

This would sound medically safe and may be more cost effective (probably you would not need to pay a separated expensive treatment).

This latter strategy would help to better monitoring of any hemodynamic changes (due to abrupt blood pressure and heart rhythm fluctuations) and promptly treating any possible complications from the first coronary angioplasty (such as stent thrombosis which fortunately was not the case).

So, to conclude there are several reasons why the completion of all the coronary arteries revascularization should be done during the first hospitalization.

From the other part, there are hospital policies trying to minimize the time of hospitalization and reduce costs, even in a public hospital (this is universal rule). And I believe in your treating hospital they have followed similar rules, of course tailored in accordance with the local legal background.

I am afraid that it is difficult to raise sufficient doubts on their decision t o follow a two stage coronary revascularization, as this is supported also by the medical and scientific evidence.

What could be discussed and probably reasonably claimed is the fact they have discharged you from the hospital a bit earlier than what should in fact be your hospital stay.

They confirmed on their response to your concern that you have not been introduced on your discharge to any vasodilator therapy (such as Lisinopril), because your systolic blood pressure was borderline (99 – 100); which in fact is a clear tendency of hypotension.

This shows not a yet stabilized hemodynamic profile, nevertheless you were discharged from the hospital, which could have posed you to several risks starting from severe hypotension with detrimental effects on the coronary stent to the other side of the coin (bouts of hypertension that could aggravate cardiac ischemia in the presence of an untreated second coronary stenosis), without mentioning the risk of a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia, a potential complication around the early period of an acute coronary syndrome (heart attack).

You should discuss with an expert who owns high proficiency in medical legal issues to support you in affording with a rational request for reducing treatment cost from the hospital.

Hope to have been of some help to you!

In case of any further questions, do not hesitate to ask me again!

Kind regards,

Dr. Iliri

Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Chakravarthy Mazumdar
doctor
default
Follow up: Dr. Ilir Sharka (8 hours later)
Dear Dr Ilir
Thank you for your very detailed and concise reply.
I will follow up with some legal advice as I have to follow my heart and belief here.
On the brighter side I wish to advise you that I am doing good...plenty of daily exercise, good diet and back to full time work. I am a vet I think I mentioned and have a new job with a heavy workload and seem to be coping quite well. My blood pressure has stabilised to within normal limits but sometimes after a stressful day systolic may get up to 129-136.
I wish I could retire but have a young daughter[15] still schooling so have to look after her.
My follow up bloods were all good.....liver,kidney normal.....TC, HDL,LDL and TG below normal.
Thanks again
Regards Gavin
doctor
Answered by Dr. Ilir Sharka (12 hours later)
Brief Answer:
You are welcome!

Detailed Answer:
Dear,

I am glad to have been helpful to you!

I would just encourage you to follow a healthy lifestyle (like you are doing now) and periodically check your blood lipid profile every 6 months.

A close monitoring of your blood pressure is necessary too.

It is also important avoiding straining physical activity (weight lifting, etc.).

Hope you will find this answer helpful!

If you have any other questions, please let me know!

I would be glad to answer to all of your questions at any time!

Wishing good health,
Thanks
Dr. Iliri
Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Chakravarthy Mazumdar
doctor
default
Follow up: Dr. Ilir Sharka (2 days later)
Dear Dr Ilir
Sorry but just a bit worried about blood pressure.
I am sure it has to do with work load...new practice and very busy and stressful.I feel ok at work and my morning blood pressure was 125/78/72[HR].
I came home tonite and felt ok...but started thinking about work and cases that had to be followed up. Suddenly had a bit of tachycardia and a flush....my BP was 162/90/88.......173/89/89.......161/89/93........160/86/83.....that was over about 40 mins.
I am feeling ok if I can switch off from thinking about work.
I am on a low dose of Lisinoprol 2.5mg daily.
Do you think I should restrict work for health reasons or take something to ease my worry and stress......or increase my Lisinoprol dose.
I would like to monitor at home rather than go to hospital.
I dont have any chest pain.


Thank you and regards Gavin
default
Follow up: Dr. Ilir Sharka (20 minutes later)
BP down to 145/78/87 now......
doctor
Answered by Dr. Ilir Sharka (19 hours later)
Brief Answer:
Opinion as follows:

Detailed Answer:
Dear,

You are right when you think of stress as a cause of those blood pressure and heart rate bouts. It seems to be an anxiety disorder behind such fluctuations.

It doesn’t matter which one is the triggering factor: thoughts about work, health issues, family, bad relationships, etc.

The outcomes are the same: palpitations, tachycardia, and elevated blood pressure values, sometimes skin flushing, nausea, near fainting, abdominal cramps, etc.

The most important issue in this regard would be to control the stressful factors (thoughts, situations, activities, etc.); and this would by properly facing with them and not avoiding them.

In other words, I don’t think that you should restrict your daily activities including work, but instead engaging in more leisure activities such as outdoor walking, cycling, yoga, aerobics would be very helpful in this regard.

In addition, just the presence of a few high blood pressure bouts would not be a rational reason for increasing the daily anti-hypertensive dose.

Instead it would be better to closely control your blood pressure values for a couple of day up to a week (several times daily) before thinking of a therapy modification.

Meanwhile, the best strategy would be continuing to follow a healthy life-style, physically active daily profile and a lot of fun.

Hope to have been helpful to you!

In case of any further questions, feel free to ask me at any time.

Kind regards,
Dr. Iliri

Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Chakravarthy Mazumdar
doctor
default
Follow up: Dr. Ilir Sharka (14 hours later)
Thank you Dr Ilir for your sound advice.
I have followed your suggestions and tried not to bring my worries from work back home....be more positive in my thought process and go for a walk after work.
my reading last nite was 117/73/74 and this morning 109/74/73.
Thanks again
Gavin
doctor
Answered by Dr. Ilir Sharka (12 hours later)
Brief Answer:
You are welcome!

Detailed Answer:
Dear XXXXXXX

I am glad to have been helpful to you!

These blood pressure values are within the normal ranges and there is nothing to worry about!

Hope to have clarified some of your uncertainties!

If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask me again!

I would be glad to answer to all of your questions!

Wishing good health,

Dr. Iliri
Note: For further follow up on related General & Family Physician Click here.

Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Chakravarthy Mazumdar
doctor
Answered by
Dr.
Dr. Ilir Sharka

Cardiologist

Practicing since :2001

Answered : 9541 Questions

premium_optimized

The User accepted the expert's answer

Share on

Get personalised answers from verified doctor in minutes across 80+ specialties

159 Doctors Online

By proceeding, I accept the Terms and Conditions

HCM Blog Instant Access to Doctors
HCM Blog Questions Answered
HCM Blog Satisfaction
Can You Give Opinion Regarding The Best Strategy To Follow In An Acute Coronary Syndrome ?

Brief Answer: I would explain as follows: Detailed Answer: Dear, I am glad to discuss with you again! I remember our last talk and would like to emphasize my opinion regarding the best strategy to follow in an acute coronary syndrome patient (which is similar to your case). Let’s start with the definition of a critical or life-threatening condition. We have seen in our daily clinical practice (working many years at an intensive cardiac care unit) that there are no clear cutoffs of the atherosclerotic plaque burden and the risk of an acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction). In other words, a myocardial infarction may occur in the presence of a 100% occluded coronary artery, as well as a dangerous and life-threatening heart attack may happen because of a 30% or 50% coronary stenoses. We have assisted many patients complicated with life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation) and apparently with clinically non-significant coronary stenoses (less than 70% - 75% coronary stenoses). If left untreated they would have otherwise died. This in not because only of the reduction in blood flow within a fixed stenosis coronary artery but because of other superimposed disorders such as coronary spasm (more likely in a moderately narrowed artery), or clot over a destabilized coronary plaque. That’s why it is difficult to predict with certainty whether it is completely safe deferring a second revascularization procedure to a distant time outside the first hospitalization. My personal professional opinion would go in favor of performing the second revascularization intervention (LAD angioplasty and stenting) within the first hospitalization a few days after RCA treatment. This would sound medically safe and may be more cost effective (probably you would not need to pay a separated expensive treatment). This latter strategy would help to better monitoring of any hemodynamic changes (due to abrupt blood pressure and heart rhythm fluctuations) and promptly treating any possible complications from the first coronary angioplasty (such as stent thrombosis which fortunately was not the case). So, to conclude there are several reasons why the completion of all the coronary arteries revascularization should be done during the first hospitalization. From the other part, there are hospital policies trying to minimize the time of hospitalization and reduce costs, even in a public hospital (this is universal rule). And I believe in your treating hospital they have followed similar rules, of course tailored in accordance with the local legal background. I am afraid that it is difficult to raise sufficient doubts on their decision t o follow a two stage coronary revascularization, as this is supported also by the medical and scientific evidence. What could be discussed and probably reasonably claimed is the fact they have discharged you from the hospital a bit earlier than what should in fact be your hospital stay. They confirmed on their response to your concern that you have not been introduced on your discharge to any vasodilator therapy (such as Lisinopril), because your systolic blood pressure was borderline (99 – 100); which in fact is a clear tendency of hypotension. This shows not a yet stabilized hemodynamic profile, nevertheless you were discharged from the hospital, which could have posed you to several risks starting from severe hypotension with detrimental effects on the coronary stent to the other side of the coin (bouts of hypertension that could aggravate cardiac ischemia in the presence of an untreated second coronary stenosis), without mentioning the risk of a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia, a potential complication around the early period of an acute coronary syndrome (heart attack). You should discuss with an expert who owns high proficiency in medical legal issues to support you in affording with a rational request for reducing treatment cost from the hospital. Hope to have been of some help to you! In case of any further questions, do not hesitate to ask me again! Kind regards, Dr. Iliri